Pages

Sunday, February 3, 2008

How the Clintons Will Destroy John McCain

Dr. Jack Wheeler, author of the To the Point blog, looks ahead in a recent post to the campaign we might expect in the tragic event that John McCain becomes the Republican nominee.
How the Clintons Will Destroy John McCain


Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler
Thursday, 31 January 2008

The number of fellow Senators who think John McCain is psychologically unstable is large. Some will admit it publicly, like Thad Cochran who says, "The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine."

Others relate times when McCain screamed four-letter obscenities right in their faces in the Senate cloak room, like Dick Shelby, Rick Santorum, or Jim Inhofe. "The man is unhinged," one Senator told me. "He is frighteningly unfit to be Commander-in-Chief."

That John McCain is clinically nuts is scary enough. What worries a small group of GOP Senators and Congressmen even more is a deep and dark skeletal secret in McCain's glorified past to which they are privy, and which the Clintons will use to blackmail him.

They have been having discussions with a Russian whom we'll call "T" for Translator. T's father was the Soviet military intelligence officer who ran the "Hanoi Hilton" prison holding captured Americans during the Vietnam War. One of those prisoners was John McCain.

The GRU -- Glavnoje Razvedyvatel'noje Upravlenije or Main Intelligence Directorate of the Soviet (now Russian) Armed Forces - operated the entire North Vietnamese prison system holding American prisoners of war. GRU officers, all of whom were Russians, oversaw the interrogation of every American POW.

The interrogations themselves were conducted by Vietnamese who spoke some English. After each interrogation session, which could often include torturing the prisoners at the direction of the GRU officers, the Vietnamese interrogator would write a report of the session - in Vietnamese.

These reports had to be translated into Russian. T, a bright teenager living in the GRU compound in Hanoi, had become fluent in Vietnamese, and ended up translating many of the reports and interrogators' notes.

John McCain, flying his A-4 Skyhawk, was shot down over Hanoi on October 26, 1967. Badly injured from the ejection, he was beaten and abused by his captors. In July, 1968, his father, US Navy Admiral J. S. McCain, was made CINCPAC, Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Command, commander of all US military forces in the Vietnam theatre. Upon learning this, the Vietnamese offered - according to McCain - to release him.

McCain claims he refused, because he demanded all American POWs captured before him be released as well. He thus remained a prisoner when he could have gone home, and was subjected to constant brutal beatings and torture for years: that is the source of the "war-hero" saga making McCain a greater war-hero than any other American POW.

Yet the offer of release would had to have been approved by the GRU overseers of the North Vietnamese - and T does not recall any such offer being made. T admits, however, that this took place before McCain was transferred to Hoa Loa prison, nicknamed the "Hanoi Hilton" by the POWs. T had only direct knowledge of what happened at Hoa Loa, and not the other prisons, where T's father was in charge.

McCain was kept at the Hanoi Hilton from December 1969 until his release, along with all the remaining POWs, in March of 1973. During this time, T translated all the Vietnamese interrogators' notes and reports regarding John McCain.

According to T, they reveal that McCain had made an "accommodation" with his captors, and in exchange, T's father saw that he was provided with an apartment in Hanoi and the services of two prostitutes. Upon returning to his prison cell, he would say he had been held in solitary confinement. That may be why so many of his fellow prisoners said later they saw so little of him at Hoa Loa.

The notes and reports written in Vietnamese were sent to Moscow, where T was a now a college student, for T's translation into Russian, then placed into GRU archives. That's where they stayed until 1991. Late that year, as the Soviet Union was collapsing, the CIA and the GRU made a deal for a document swap.

All of what it involved, T doesn't know. What T's father, by now retired but still with substantial contacts within the GRU, did learn (and thus T learned) was that the swap included all of T's translations.

In other words, the CIA has in its possession the notes and reports of John McCain's interrogators at the Hanoi Hilton, in both the original Vietnamese and translated Russian, showing collaboration with his Communist captors.

Allegations of this nature have been made over the years, many by Vietnam veterans. There is an even an organization, Vietnam Veterans Against McCain. But they are based on suspicions and circumstantial claims. There has never been any hard direct evidence.

What T says the CIA has is such evidence. Its release would destroy McCain. The threat of its release could force McCain to take a fall, blow the election and lose on purpose. And just who do you suppose would know what the CIA has and work with them to release it?

Someone who has been a CIA asset since he was recruited by London station chief Cord Meyer while a student at Oxford in 1968?

(Back in the 90s years after he retired, if Cord drank a little too much Scotch, he would laugh derisively at those conspiratorialists who accused Bill Clinton of being connected with the KGB.

"They all darkly point to Bill's participation in anti-war peace conferences in Stockholm and Oslo, and his trip to Leningrad, Moscow, and Prague while he was at Oxford. ‘Who could have paid for this?', they ask. ‘It had to be the KGB!' they claim." Cord would shake his head. "What rot - we paid for it. We recruited Bill the first week he was at Oxford. Bill's been an asset of The Three Bad Words ever since." Cord passed on in 2001.)

The small group of Senators and Congressmen who have been briefed by T have been unable to confirm with the CIA any details of its document swap with the GRU beyond an admission that such a swap "may have happened." They are very nervous about pursuing the matter any further.

The Clintons are not nervous. They are utterly ruthless, and have buddies at Langley all too happy to help them.

It has been noted many times here in To The Point that while most folks think the CIA is a right-wing outfit, it is not. The CIA has been dominated by left-wing hyper-liberals for years.

The CIA is a left-wing, liberal outfit, and its main job for some time now is not attacking America's enemies but conservatives in general and George W. Bush in particular. The story is best told by friend, Ken Timmerman in his new book Shadow Warriors.

When the time is right, the Clintons will see to the leaking of the GRU archives on McCain to the media. Bet on it, just as you can bet they'll follow it up with media disclosures of the lady lobbyists in Washington having adulterous affairs with McCain. (There are at least three of them; I know the name of one but I'm not going to put it in writing.)

Maybe McCain will try to fight back by confirming Hillary's well-known bisexuality and her lesbian affair with her beautiful assistant, Huma Abedin. Google "Hillary" and "Huma Abedin" and you'll get almost 6,000 hits. Turns out Huma is a Moslem who grew up in Saudi Arabia and is strongly suspected of working for Saudi intelligence.

Or maybe he'll capitulate to Clinton blackmail. You never can tell what a psychologically unstable guy will do.

And that last point is why - be prepared for this, folks - I would not in any circumstances vote for John McCain, not if either Hillary or Obama were the alternative. Evil is safer than crazy. Leftie amateur inexperience is safer than crazy. So I agree with Ann Coulter who says:

"I'd rather deal with President Hillary than with President McCain. With Hillary, we'll get the same ruinous liberal policies with none of the responsibility."

How in the world can the Republican Party get saddled with a nutcase whack-job who knows nothing about economics, is so anti-capitalist he uses "profit" as a term of derision, has never run a business or had any job outside of government, will raise taxes, is so stupid that he believes "stopping global warming" is worth destroying the American economy, won't drill ANWR, won't appoint strict constructionist justices, won't protect marriage, will give amnesty to 20 million illegal aliens, is beloved by the New York Times, and lives in a delusionary world of vanity and rage?

Rush is right. A McCain presidency will be the destruction of the Republican Party. It needs to be rebuilt, not wiped out with the field clear for the fascists of the left to consolidate power and eliminate freedom.

And maybe the only way to rebuild it is in dedicated impassioned opposition to a Clinton White House. That should be the subject of Ann Coulter's next book. I've already got the title for her. Her last book was If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans.

Ann needs to now write this book: If Republicans Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans.


10 comments:

  1. I totally agree 100% with your column.

    http://www.davidkfuller.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your suggestion for Coulter's next book title is too funny.

    But didn't you see the polls? McCain will beat both Hillary and Obama in a general.

    One of the guys over at MSNBC said that "Republicans are relieved that McCain can play hardball" after the California debate. Just imagine how that admiration will turn to red fury when McCain dares to try to play hardball with the first women or first black Presidential nominee? I agree with Ann and Tammy, also.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting article. I agree that McCain appears to have some stability problems. I do not want him near the White House. I will write in Mitt or vote for Hillary or sit it out but I will not vote for McCain.
    I do not think people will believe that POW stuff about McCain even if it is true and might backfire on anyone using it without solid evidence. I do not believe wild stories about public figures because there is just no way to substantiate and falls into rhe realm of tin foil hats and conspiracy theories - even if they are true. The Dems will use the crazy factor and any thing they can to get elected and he won't win without conservative vote.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As a voter, I don't care one bit about your claims. I voted for McCain and I will vote for him in the general election. No candidate for president is ever perfect and I prefer someone with a temper and experience to protect my country than a left wing man-child who wants to invade Pakistan on the one hand and sit down for tea with Chavez and the Mullahs on the other - or a ruthless phony who wants to be president to satisfy her own power ambitions.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This blog is full of anonymous unsubstantiated accusations. Are you sure you are not working for the Russians,m since your source is a Russian? They would love to get a weak President like Romney (or Clinton) in place, instead of the tough one, McCain.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Excuse me, weak Romney is not, you have no idea what you are talking about, you only listen to the media. BRAVO.

    Mitt Romney would be a great President and if he is not the nominee, I would gladly take Hillary. At least we know the Clintons, McCain on the other hand is a short tempered demanding old man that has a dedicated wife who looks extremely ignored. I am a life long Republican and know many others who will not be FORCED to vote for that man just because he supposedly represents us conservatives. It's all a matter of principles. You cant change a dog new tricks and McCain attempting to appeal to the conservative base will not work!

    ReplyDelete
  7. McCain had to do what he did to survive. Although he is a LIBERAL DEMOCRAT and does not belong in the Republican party, he is a true hero.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes a war monger open borders high tax liberal corruptionist career politician thats also a loose cannon as well. Sounds great. That's what we all need.

    ReplyDelete
  9. why do you think the msm has been building up juan mccain the way they have? only to have so much fun in tearing him down. this guy is going to be a disaster of a candidate.

    ReplyDelete
  10. You say a lot, but offer no proof. Are you sure the title is how the Clintons will destroy McCain? or should it be, how I hope they destroy McCain. Talk about insane, talk to the secret service and the Marines who served in the White House during her "reign". Maybe you'll learn some facts.

    ReplyDelete