By Paul G. Kengor
Try to define progressivism. In fact, ask progressives to try to define progressivism. All we really know is that they’re, well, progressing.
They and their ideas and their politics are always changing, evolving.
This means that what they believe and hold fast and dear today may not
be what they believe and hold fast and dear tomorrow, or decades or a
century from now.
For instance, when progressive heroine Margaret Sanger
started her American Birth Control League a century ago, she was
seeking birth control for, among other purposes, what she and fellow
progressives termed “race improvement.” She hoped to expunge the gene
pool of what she termed “human weeds,”
“morons,” and “imbeciles.” She repudiated abortion, calling it “an
alternative that I cannot too strongly condemn … the practice of it
merely for limitation of offspring is dangerous and vicious.” She
clarified in no uncertain terms: “some ill-informed persons have the
notion that when we speak of birth control we include abortion as a
method. We certainly do not.”
Today, Sanger’s American Birth Control
League is Planned Parenthood, America’s largest abortion provider.
Progressives have not only progressed to that level but also to
the point where they demand full taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood
and birth control and abortion drugs. Most amazing, those who disagree
are castigated as Neanderthals favoring a “war on women.”
How did we suddenly progress to this latest stage?
That’s a long answer with a lot of
factors, but we cannot disregard the huge impact of the latest
influence: President Obama. If you would have told me five years ago
that the president of the United States, by executive fiat, would force
all Americans—including all religious organizations—to fund
sterilization services and abortion drugs, I would have at least taken
solace in one thing: my liberal friends would surely respect my
religious beliefs and insist their president was crossing the line.
Sorry, the opposite is true. With
President Obama leading, millions of Democrats have willfully fallen in
line. He is not bending, and neither are they. If we disagree with what
they’re compelling us to do … that’s our fault. We have failed to progress to their understanding.
My pro-choice friends always promised
they’d never force me to pay for their abortions. With Obama out front,
that has changed. They simply hadn’t progressed there yet.
The same is true for gay marriage,
where liberals—immediately after Obama’s statement on gay marriage to
ABC a few months ago—are suddenly on fire for the cause, from blasting
Chick-fil-A to, according to The New York Times, considering the
unprecedented step of placing gay marriage in the Democratic Party
platform. Consider liberals’ progression on this issue:
A half century ago, the concept of “gay
marriage” would have been unthinkable to any Democrat. Currently, I’m
being frequently asked about parallels in thinking between Obama and his
mentor, Frank Marshall Davis.
There are striking similarities when it comes to their words on Wall
Street, the rich, tax cuts, wealth redistribution, universal healthcare.
I’m often asked if Davis’ writings indicated support for gay marriage
and abortion. Are you kidding? Anyone who might have voiced public
support for those things back then, Democrat or Republican or radical,
would have been hauled off to an asylum as a public menace.
Just 20 years ago, the previous
Democratic president, Bill Clinton, supported the Defense of Marriage
Act, which defined marriage as strictly between a man and a woman.
While support for gay marriage has
increased since then, what the progressive movement needed was a front
man to light the fuse and take the lead. They got it big-time from
President Obama. Just like that, the entire public debate has changed,
with gay-marriage advocates on the offensive and opponents on the
defensive. Those opposing the unwavering norm since the dawn of humanity, following the billions before us—what Chesterton called the “Democracy of the Dead”—are
suddenly framed as extremists who must explain ourselves. And CEOs of
companies who voice a mere opinion to the contrary—e.g., Chick-fil-A—are
picketed, protested, banned, and attacked by the nation’s mayors for
manufacturing everything from “hate thoughts” to “hate chicken.”
Progressivism. No one can see where it will end up, but we can see how it unfolds. In this latest manifestation—call it President Obama’s progress—it
compels all of us to acquiesce on gay marriage and abortion. Obama
didn’t begin the push, but, in only four years, he has advanced the
progressive project by leaps and bounds, a stunning surge that doesn’t
happen without him.
In 2008, Barack Obama promised
fundamental, transformational change—and now, thanks to the American
electorate, we’re getting it.
Dr. Paul Kengor is professor of political science at Grove City College, executive director of The Center for Vision & Values, and author of the book, “The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis, The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor.” His other books include "The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism" and "Dupes: How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century."
No comments:
Post a Comment