By Patrick J. Buchanan
“Abe tightens grip on power as Japanese shun election.”
So ran the page one headline of the Financial Times on the victory of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in Sunday’s elections.
Abe is the most nationalistic leader of postwar Japan. He is
rebooting nuclear power, building up Japan’s military, asserting her
rights in territorial disputes with China and Korea.
And he is among a host of leaders of large and emerging powers who may fairly be described as the new nationalistic strong men.
Xi Jinping is another. Staking a claim to all the islands in the
South and East China seas, moving masses of Han Chinese into Tibet and
Uighur lands to swamp native peoples, purging old comrades for
corruption, Xi is the strongest leader China has seen in decades.
He sits astride what may now be the world’s largest economy and is
asserting his own Monroe Doctrine. Hong Kong’s democracy protests were
tolerated until Xi tired of them. Then they were swept off the streets.
Call it Putinism. It appears to be rising, while the New World Order
of Bush I, the “global hegemony” of the neocons, and the democracy
crusade of Bush II seem to belong to yesterday.
Narendra Modi, leader of the Hindu nationalist party who was denied
entry into the United States for a decade for complicity in or
toleration of a massacre of Muslims is now Prime Minister of India.
“Members of the rightwing Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh,” the FT
reports, “the Organisation of National Volunteers that gave birth to the
Bharatiya Janata party headed by Mr. Modi — have been appointed to key
posts in the governing party and cultural institutions.
“Nationalists have railed in public against the introduction of
‘western’ practices such as wearing bikinis on the beach, putting
candles on birthday cakes and using English in schools — all to the
chagrin of fretful liberals.”
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is another such leader.
Once seen as a model of the enlightened ruler who blended his Islamic
faith with a secular state, seeking friendship with all of his
neighbors, he has declared cold war on Israel, aided the Islamic State
in Syria, and seems to be reigniting the war with the Kurds, distancing
himself from his NATO allies and the U.S., and embracing Putin’s Russia.
Not since Ataturk has Turkey had so nationalistic a leader.
And as the democracy demonstrators were routed in Hong Kong, so, too,
were the Tahrir Square “Arab Spring” demonstrators in Egypt, home
country to one in four Arabs.
With the overthrow of Hosni Mubarak, the Muslim Brotherhood came to
power in free elections, but was then overthrown by the Egyptian Army.
General Abdul Fattah al-Sisi is now president and rules as autocratically as Mubarak, or Nasser before him.
Thousands of the Muslim Brotherhood are in prison, hundreds face the
death penalty. Yet, despite the military coup that brought Sisi to
power, and the repression, the American aid continues to flow.
What do these leaders have in common?
All are strong men. All are nationalists. Almost all tend to a social
conservatism from which Western democracies recoil. Almost none
celebrate democracy or democratic values the way we do.
And almost all reject America’s claim to be the “indispensable nation” or “exceptional nation” and superpower leader.
Fareed Zakaria lists as “crucial elements of Putinism … nationalism,
religion, social conservatism, state capitalism and government
domination of the media. They are all, in some way or another, different
from and hostile to, modern Western values of individual rights,
tolerance, cosmopolitanism, and internationalism.”
Yet not every American revels in the sewer that is our popular
culture. Not every American believes we should impose our democratist
ideology on other nations. Nor are Big Media and Hollywood universally
respected. Patriotism, religion and social conservatism guide the lives
of a majority of Americans today.
As the Associated Press reports this weekend, Putinism finds echoes
across Central and Western Europe. Hungary’s Viktor Orban has said he
sees in Russia a model for his own “illiberal state.”
The National Front’s Marine Le Pen wants to bring France into a new
Gaullist Europe, stretching “from the Atlantic to the Urals,” with
France seceding from the EU superstate.
“Of the 24 right-wing populist parties that took about a quarter of
the European Parliament seats in May elections, Political Capital lists
15 as ‘committed’ to Russia,” writes the AP.
These rising right-wing parties are “partners” of Russia in that they
“share key views — advocacy of traditional family values, belief in
authoritarian leadership, a distrust of the U.S., and support for strong
law and order measures.”
While the financial collapse caused Orban to turn his back on the
West, says Zakaria, to the Hungarian prime minister, liberal values
today embody “corruption, sex and violence,” and Western Europe has
become a land of “freeloaders on the backs of welfare systems.”
If America is a better country today than she has ever been, why are so many, East and West, recoiling from what we offer now?
No comments:
Post a Comment