It's no accident that the English-speaking nations are the ones most devoted to law and individual rights, writes Daniel Hannan
Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Winston Churchill on board the HMS Prince of Wales, August 1941 Hulton Archive/Getty Images |
By Daniel Hannan
Asked, early in his presidency, whether he believed in American exceptionalism,
Barack Obama
gave a telling reply. "I believe in American exceptionalism, just
as I suspect the Brits believe in British exceptionalism and the Greeks
believe in Greek exceptionalism."
The
first part of that answer is fascinating (we'll come back to the Greeks
in a bit). Most Brits do indeed believe in British exceptionalism. But
here's the thing: They define it in almost exactly the same way that
Americans do. British exceptionalism, like its American cousin, has
traditionally been held to reside in a series of values and
institutions: personal liberty, free contract, jury trials, uncensored
newspapers, regular elections, habeas corpus, open competition, secure
property, religious pluralism.
The
conceit of our era is to assume that these ideals are somehow the
natural condition of an advanced society—that all nations will get
around to them once they become rich enough and educated enough. In
fact, these ideals were developed overwhelmingly in the language in
which you are reading these words. You don't have to go back very far to
find a time when freedom under the law was more or less confined to the
Anglosphere: the community of English-speaking democracies.
Read more at The Wall Street Journal >>